- #Parallels desktop review update
- #Parallels desktop review driver
- #Parallels desktop review full
- #Parallels desktop review windows
However, video type things seem to work fine. You’ll see your screen blank when you go to shut down. When you move them across the screen you see bits of the background draw as well.
#Parallels desktop review windows
And it’s odd, you see your Windows background map under new windows before they draw. Other than what I’ve already mentioned it’s slow, really slow. It’s a really great idea, but the implementation is anything but seamless. It’s much much nicer to use!Īnd for anyone reading who’s considering buying: Coherence sucks. The last release was an enormous gain from the one before. It’s just that frustrating to see it almost where I need it and to have to hack the rest myself and deal with the frustration of the bugs. That said, I use Parallels almost daily because it’s so useful. Especially if you’re gonna charge $80 for it. You’re halfway there guys, don’t stop now. I gave up when the default resolution was larger than my resolution and I couldn’t get X to use the resolutions I configured it for.įorget all of this “making Windows seemless” crap and make a good product. Solaris 10, which is supported, required a strange sequence of reboots and kernel selections to get it installed and running. The FTP I run on my client OS is good enough for now.Ĩ.) (Major) It doesn’t seem to get along well with all systems. I don’t care about drag and drop, although it’d be nice.
#Parallels desktop review driver
A mouse driver and real support for changing resolutions would go a LONG way. However, applications run at normal speed, aside from slow Windows.Ħ.) (Major) In the last version (I’ve yet to see this in the latest release) Parallels would occasionally make Finder (and thus new windows) completely unusable.ħ.) (Minor) The article stated this, but it needs to be restated: X based systems are uncomfortable to use.
#Parallels desktop review full
Full screen is actually a better feature, especially if you have two monitors: It actually works as it should.Ģ.) (Major) On my machine, if I start Parallels while iTunes is playing music it slows the machine to a crawl.ģ.) (Minor) It constantly eats cycles even if the hosted OS is entirely idle.Ĥ.) (Minor) The hosted OS seems unaware of laptop power issues.ĥ.) (Minor) Windows are slower to open while parallels is running, regardless of hosted OS or mode. It doesn’t work with expose (Windows appears as one window), it is limited to one monitor at a time. However, it has some extremely obnoxious issues and some minor issues:ġ.) (Minor) Coherence is nice, but it’s hardly coherent. It’s a great idea and it’s about half usable.
#Parallels desktop review update
I think however this has only been promised in a 2.x release, and I don’t think that this will be a free upgrade (as stated in the review) as this would be a major update (I believe Parallels have only said 1.x upgrades would be free – but can’t confirm this so feel free to contradict). Cutting and pasting between the two was a breeze and it has made me a big fan of this new feature of Parallels.ģD support when it comes will be nice of course. That was until I had to do some work the last couple of days which involved editing some data that I could only do with the help of programs on both platforms.
My first impression of coherence mode was that it was a gimmick. However for my Windows needs Parallels works perfectly for me and I am a very satisfied customer. As a VM solution it has mostly targetted Windows, and I personally would have liked to see more support for Linux or other OSes (BeOS for example) so losing 2 for that seems about right.
It would have been better if it had have mentioned bootcamp, but I think even with that their “score” of 8 seems about right.
0 kommentar(er)
